In 2024, after 25 years, the Goi Peace Foundation held the last round of its International Essay Contest for Young People. It cited “the evolution of AI technology” among its reasons.
Soon there may be no way to tell AI-generated text from a human manuscript. That is fine for paywalled news and adverts (nobody wants to read those anyway; the robots can write them for each other). It is a disaster for education and academia, where the point of writing is not production but learning. If students cannot show that they understand what they wrote, or take responsibility for their words, education becomes even more symbolic than it already is, and students lean on AI a little more every term.
Some of the blame is ours. We have graded perfection and grammar for so long that students are scared to even try. No red pen in history has ever made anyone braver. So let’s normalise mistakes, messy first drafts and sentences that start three times. Let’s make writing transparent, so everyone can see how an idea takes shape and how a perfect manuscript grows out of a terrible paragraph that once began “In today’s society…”.
Alekhni wants to be a small catalyst for that change in this new era. We cannot promise masterpieces. We can promise that every one of them will come with its version history. Even Shakespeare had a draft 1; we assume it opened with “To be, or something.”
Bold claim. A Finnish cat would say “miau miau”. Please cite one cat from outside your flat.
Asked the neighbour’s cat. She said “miau” and walked off. Peer review is brutal.